Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 4/2017: 19-33

Methodological Framework for Operational Risk AssessmentReviewed - Review

Josef Procházka, Josef Melichar

The article brings a "Condition-If-Then" construct as a proven protocol for writing risk statement and its application into assessing risks related to capability gaps identified during the defense planning processAuthors discuss utility of "Common approach" and "Impact averse approach" to risk rank ordering as a tool for ordering risks according to their importance. Using the discussed tools enables the planners to run risk assessment that sets preconditions for prioritizing the Force Development Options (FDOs) and for minimizing the impact of capability gaps on conduct of future operations. The ORAMF and the application of the given protocol for writing risks are some of the building blocks of the defense planning process, offering a toolset for reinforcement of the defense planning of the Czech Republic.

Keywords: Risk Assessment; Impact; Probability; Impact Area; Risk Identification; Risk Prioritization; Capability Gap

Published: December 15, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Procházka, J., & Melichar, J. (2017). Methodological Framework for Operational Risk Assessment. Czech Military Review, 98(4), 19-33
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Analysis Support Guide for Risk-Based Strategic Planning. Scienece and Technology Organisation, Technical Report STO-TR-SAS-093-Part-I.2017.
    2. MELICHAR, Josef. Plánování na základě schopností v procesu obranného plánování s využitím prognostických metod v podmínkách rezortu obrany ČR. Studie. Brno: Univerzita obrany, 2015, 40 s.
    3. MELICHAR, Josef; PARGÁČ, Petr; LEŠTINSKÝ, Boris. Kvalitativní výzkum využívání postupů pro stanovení požadavků na schopnosti a pro plánování rozvoje schopností v resortu MO ČR. Studie. Brno: 2017, 22 s.
    4. BAXA, Fabian. Stav plánování schopností v rezortu obrany ČR a jeho příčiny. Studie. Brno: CBVSS, 2015, 33 s.
    5. MELICHAR, Josef; PROCHÁZKA, Josef; PROCHÁZKA, Dalibor; HODICKÝ, Jan. Ověření návrhu rámce pro plánování schopností, hodnocení rizik a využití válečné hry pro plánování schopností. 2017, 41 s.
    6. DAVIS, Paul, K. RAND National Defence Research Institute, 2002. Analytic Architectire for Capabilities-Based Planning, Mission-System Analysis, and Transformation, dostupné na internetu: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1513.html
    7. (Capability Based Planning Handbook, MOD Canada, June 2014, 2014)
    8. GLAERUM, Sigurd, Alf Christian Hennum, Analytical Support to Norwegian Long-Term Defense Planning, Czech Military Review, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 82-91, 2016, Extraordinary volume, ISSN 1210-3292.
    9. DAVIE, M., Comparative Defense Planning Lessons for New Zealand, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2013
    10. RTO/NATO, "Handbook on Long Term Defense Planning", St. Joseph Print Group Inc., Otawa, 2003. ISBN 92-837-1098-3.
    11. GARVEY, Paul, R., Analytical methods for risk management: a system engineering perspective, Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1st edition (1601), Bedford, Massachusets, USA, 2008, ISBN 978-1-58488-637-2
    12. SMEJKAL, V., RAIS, K, Řízení rizik ve firmách a jiných organizacích. 4. vydání. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2013, 488 s. Expert. ISBN 978-80-247-4644-9.
    13. PITCHARD, Carl, L., Risk Management: Concepts and Guidance, Fifth edition, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis group, USA, 2015, ISBN 978-1-4822-5845-5
    14. MELICHAR, Josef. Scénáře - tvorba, vnitřní struktura, scénáře a bezpečnostní hrozby. Vojenské rozhledy. 2017, 26 (2), 18-32. DOI: 10.3849/2336- 2995.26.2017.02.018-032. ISSN 1210-3292 (print), 2336-2995 (on-line). Available at: www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    15. GARVEY, Paul, R., Analytical methods for risk management: a system engineering perspective, Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1st edition (1601), Bedford, Massachusets, USA, 2008, ISBN 978-1-58488-637-2
    16. FDOs - Force Development Options
    17. GARVEY, Paul, R., Analytical methods for risk management: a system engineering perspective, Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1st edition (1601), Bedford, Massachusets, USA, 2008, ISBN 978-1-58488-637-2
    18. Ministr of Defence Directive 66/2012, Activity Planning and Development of Ministry of Defence
    19. Standard Operating Procedure
    20. Tactics, Techiques, Procedures

    Return to the content