Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 2/2017: 44-55

Development and Change of the Concept of Hybrid WarReviewed - Review

Richard Stojar

The aim of the paper is description and analysis of the transformation of the concept of hybrid war. The Russian intervention in Ukraine in 2014 meant principal re-definition of the concept which is reflected in the contemporary views on the hybrid wars and hybrid threats. The concept of hybrid war had been questioned in the past already as his validity and the efforts to be applied on the past conflicts deformed its innovative content. One could argue, that adding new dimensions and topic such as economic factors, ideological activity etc. brings risk of concept´s expansion which goes far behind of the framework of the phenomenon of the war and the use of armed forces in the armed conflicts. The author draws attention to the fact that the definition of hybrid war tends to be subordinate to the current needs, which in turn only hinders their explanation potential.

Keywords: Hybrid War; Hybrid Threats; Armed Conflicts; Concept.

Published: June 15, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Stojar, R. (2017). Development and Change of the Concept of Hybrid War. Czech Military Review98(2), 44-55
Download citation

References

  1. WALKER, R. G. The United States Marine Corps and Special Operations, Monterey: NPS Theses 1998, s. 7.
  2. LATAWSKI, Pl. Hybrid Character of Warware. Sandhurst: Royal Military Academy 2016.
  3. FRANTA, D. Hledání hranice válečné agrese ve světle hybridní války. Brno: CBVSS UO 2016, s. 10.
  4. MATTIS, J. N., HOFFMAN, F. G. Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. In Proceedings Magazine, November 2005, s. 18-19. Dostupné z: http://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2005-11
  5. HOFFMAN, G., F. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies 2007, s. 28.
  6. HOFFMAN, G., F. Hybrid vs. Compound War. Armed Forces Journal, Vol. 147, No. 3/2009, s. 16.
  7. GATES, R. Služba. Brno: Host 2016, s. 179.
  8. MEDEK, Rudolf. O našich legiích, dětech a zvířátkách na Sibiři. Praha 1933, s. 130.
  9. KŘÍŽ, Z., SHEVCHUK, Z., ŠTEVKOV, P. Hybridní válka jako nový fenomén v bezpečnostním prostředí Evropy. Praha - Ostrava: Jagello 2000, 2015, s. 9.
  10. FRANK, L. Trendy vývoje bezpečnostního prostředí a jejich důsledky pro ozbrojené síly. Defence & Strategy conference 2015. Brno: Univerzita obrany 2015, s. 35-43.
  11. MAREŠ, M. Hybridní hrozby v České republice a jak jim čelit. Natoaktual.cz, 14.11.2016. Dostupné z: goo.gl/eQlRgT
  12. MURRAY, W., MANSOOR, P. Hybrid Warfare. Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present. Ohio State University 2012.
  13. ŽILINČÍK, S., PIKNER, I. Kritický pohl´ad na hybridné vojny. Národná a medzinárodná bezpečnosť 2016, Liptovský Mikuláš: AOS 2016, s. 611.
  14. McCULLOH,T. The Inadequacy of Definition and the Utility of a Theory of Hybrid Conflict: Is the Hybrid Threat New? Joint Special Operations University 2012, s. ix.
  15. FRANTA, D. Hledání hranice válečné agrese ve světle hybridní války. Brno: CBVSS UO 2016, s. 12.
  16. KILCULLEN, D. The Accidental Guerilla. Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press 2009.
  17. KUBEŠA, M., SPIŠÁK, J. Hybridní hrozby a vývoj nové operační koncepce NATO. Obrana a strategie 2/2011.
  18. FABIAN, Sandor. Hybrid Warfare Revisited. CTX (The Combating Terrorism Exchange) Global ECCO (Education Community Collaboration Online), 2015, 2015(Volume 5, No.2), s. 39.
  19. BOND, M. Hybrid War: A New Paradigm For Stability Operations In Failing States. Carlisle: U.S. Army War College, 2007.
  20. McCULLOH, Timothy, JOHNSON, Richard. Hybrid Warfare. JSOU Report 13-4. MacDill Air Force Base Florida: Joint Special Operations University 2013.
  21. FABIAN, S. Hybrid Warfare Revisited. CTX (The Combating Terrorism Exchange) Global ECCO (Education Community Collaboration Online), 2015, 2015(Volume 5, No.2), s. 37.
  22. STOJAR, R. Konflikt na Ukrajině a ruský zásah: Nový způsob vedení hybridní války nebo aplikace klasických postupů? Vojenské rozhledy- Czech Military Review., 2015, roč. 24 (56), č. 1, s. 37.
  23. DORAN, B., P. Land Warfare in Europe. Lessons and Recomendations from the War in Ukraine. Center for European Policy Analysis. November 2016.
  24. KOFMAN, M. Russian hybrid warfare and other dark arts. War on the Rocks. 11.3.2016. Dostupné z: https://goo.gl/TH9okv
  25. BARTLES, K., Charles. Getting Gerasimov Right. Military Review January-February 2016, s. 31. Dostupné z: https://goo.gl/zVnBlM
  26. VISINGR, Lukáš. In: Valerij Gerasimov: mozek ruské armády, která vede tažení v Donbasu. Dostupné z: http://zpravy.idnes.cz/putinovi-muzi-valerij-gerasimov-nacelnik-generalniho-stabu-zpusob-boje-hybridni-valky-gtf-/zahranicni.aspx?c=A150529_174502_zahranicni_aba
  27. KORYBKO, Andrew. Hybrid Wars: The Indirect Adaptative Approache to Regime Change. Moscow: RPFU 2015. 127 s.
  28. VLADIMIROV, Aleksandr. "Gibridnyje vojny" v obščej teorii vojny. In Konferencija "Gibridnyje vojny XXI. Veka", Voennyj universitet MO RF 2015.
  29. STOJAR, R. Konflikt na Ukrajině a ruský zásah: Nový způsob vedení hybridní války nebo aplikace klasických postupů? Vojenské rozhledy- Czech Military Review., 2015, roč. 24 (56), č. 1, s. 37.
  30. MELNYK, O. AF in the Antiterrorist Operation. Presentation for Swedisch Defence University 2015. Dostupné z: http://old.razumkov.org.ua/upload/1465544030_file.pdf
  31. MAREŠ, M. From Subcultural Groupings to Actors of Hybrid Warfare: Current Trends in Conflicts in Eastern Europe. Vojenské rozhledy - Czech Military Review. 2016, 25 (Mimořádné číslo), s. 131.