Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 3/2016: 3-20

Deeskalace války na Ukrajině pomocí mezinárodních bezpečnostních organizací.Recenzované - Přehledový

Ing. Zbyněk Dubský, Ph.D.

Článek se zaměřuje na identifikaci nástrojů použitých mezinárodními bezpečnostními organizacemi (NATO, Evropská unie, Organizace pro bezpečnost a spolupráci v Evropě) při deeskalaci a řešení násilného konfliktu na Ukrajině. Vychází z pozic liberálního institucionalismu. Charakterizuje a systematizuje nástroje a rozděluje je na "soft power" a "hard power". Je analyzována možnost použití ozbrojených sil v rámci donucení nebo v rámci peacekeepingu a monitoringu. NATO a EU se zapojily do nátlakové diplomacie, OBSE jako "soft power", se zapojila do zprostředkovaní konfliktu na východě Ukrajiny a vyslala dlouhodobé mise. Všechny tři analyzované organizace používaly nástroje bez použití vojenské síly.

Klíčová slova: Ukrajina; NATO; Evropská unie; OBSE; liberální institucionalismus; řešení konfliktů; deeskalace.

De-escalation of the War at Ukraine, and Its Resolution by International Security Organisations.

The article is aimed on the identification of the tools of the international security organisations (NATO, European Union, Organisation for security and Cooperation in Europe) for de-escalation and resolution of the violent conflict in Ukraine. It is based on the liberal institucionalism. It characterizes and systematises tools and divides it into "soft power" and "hard power" tools. It is analysed the possibility of the use of armed forces as a coercive tool or in peacekeeping or monitoring missions. The NATO and the EU became involved in coercive diplomacy, the OSCE as a "soft power" becomes involved in mediation of the conflict in eastern Ukraine and dispatched long time missions. All three analysed organisations used the tools without placing of armed forces.

Keywords: Ukraine; NATO; European Union; OSCE; Liberal Institutionalism; Conflict Resolution; De-escalation.

Zveřejněno: 15. září 2016  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dubský, Z. (2016). Deeskalace války na Ukrajině pomocí mezinárodních bezpečnostních organizací. Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review, 97(3), 3-20
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. EICHLER, Jan. Černomořská dimenze války na Ukrajině. Vojenské rozhledy. 2016, roč. 25 (57). č.1, str. 6-23. ISSN 1210-3292 (tištěná verze), ISSN 2336-2995 (on-line). Dostupné z: www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    2. DOBROVSKÝ, Luboš. Polemika s neorealistickými teoriemi mezinárodních vztahů. Vojenské rozhledy. 2016, roč. 25 (57). č.2, str. 144-147. ISSN 1210-3292 (tištěná verze), ISSN 2336-2995 (on-line). Dostupné z: www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    3. LARRABEE, Stephen. Russia, Ukraine, and Central Europe: The Return of Geopolitics. Journal of International Affairs. 2010, č. 63(2), str. 33-52. ISSN 0022-197X
    4. ALLISON, Roy. Russian 'deniable' intervention in Ukraine: how and why Russia broke the rules. International Affairs. 2014, roč. 90, č. 6, str. 1255-1297. ISSN-e 1468-2346
    5. Jako válku označují tento eskalovaný násilný konflikt instituty pro výzkum konfliktů a jejich řešení. např. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) nebo The Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research (HIIK), viz. Conflict Barometer 2014 [online]. The Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research 2015 [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://hiik.de/en/konfliktbarometer/pdf/ConflictBarometer_2014.pdf
    6. BERCOVITCH, J., V. KREMENYUK, W.ZARTMAN. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2009. ISBN 9781412921923 nebo RAMSBOTHAM, O., T. WOODHOUSE, H. MIALL. Contemporary Conflict Resolution (3rd Edition), Polity, 2011. ISBN 978-0745649740
    7. BARASH, David P. a Charles P. WEBEL. Peace and Conflict Studies, Thousend Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2002. ISBN 978-1412961202
    8. KEOHANE, Robert O. a Joseph S. NYE Jr.. Power and Interdependence (4th Edition) (Longman Classics in Political Science). Pearson, 2011. ISBN 0205082912
    9. WAEVER, Ole. Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms. In: NEUMANN, Iver a Ole Waever (eds.). The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making. London: Routledge, 1997, s. 1-37. ISBN 9780415144087
    10. KEOHANE, Robert O. a Joseph S. NYE Jr.. Power and Interdependence (4th Edition) (Longman Classics in Political Science). Pearson, 2011. ISBN 0205082912
    11. BERCOVITCH, J., V. KREMENYUK, W.ZARTMAN. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution, Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2009. ISBN 9781412921923; RAMSBOTHAM, O., T. WOODHOUSE, H. MIALL. Contemporary Conflict Resolution (3rd Edition), Polity, 2011. ISBN 978-0745649740; LUND, Michael S. Preventing Violent Conflict: A Strategy for Preventive Diplomacy, United States Institute of Peace, 1996. ISBN 1878379526
    12. FREEDMAN, Lawrence (2014), Ukraine and the Art of Crisis Management, The International Institute for Strategic Studies. Survival Global Politics and Strategy. 2014, č. 56 (3), str. 7-42. ISSN 0039-6338 (Tištěná verze), ISSN 1468-2699 (On-line)
    13. Decision on Deployment of an OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (OSCE PC Decision No. 1117) (2014) [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/pc/116747?download=true
    14. NYE, Joseph S. Jr. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, PublicAffairs, 2004. ISBN 1586483064
    15. HYDE-PRICE, Adrian. "Normative" Power Europe: A Realist Critique. Journal of European Public Policy. 2006, č. 13(2), str. 217-34. ISSN 1350-1763
    16. OBSE se může na základě konsenzu rozhodnout, v závislosti na daném konkrétním případě, pokud účastnické státy usoudí, že je nejefektivnější a nejvhodnější organizací. OBSE může rozhodnout poskytnout mandát pro operace zahrnující peacekeeping prováděný jinými státy nebo organizacemi. Istanbul Document. 1999 [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/mc/39569?download=true
    17. FLIKKE, G., WIGEN, E., BLAKKISRUD, H., KOLSTØ, P. The Shifting Geopolitics of the Black Sea Region. Actors, Drivers and Challenges. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI). 2011.
    18. JONSSON, Oscar a Robert SEELY. Russian Full-Spectrum Conflict: An Appraisal After Ukraine. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 2015, č. 28(1), str. 1-22. ISSN 1351-8046 nebo CIMBALA, Stephen J. Sun Tzu and Salami Tactics? Vladimir Putin and Military Persuasion in Ukraine, 21 February-18 March 2014, The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 2014, č. 27(3), str. 359-379. ISSN 1351-8046
    19. DAVIS, Christopher Mark. The Ukraine conflict, economic-military power balances and economic sanctions, Post-Communist Economies, č. 28(2), 2016, str. 167-198 ISSN 1463-1377
    20. 'Strong' Russian presence in eastern Ukraine: NATO chief, 2015. [online]. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: https://www.yahoo.com/news/strong-russian-presence-eastern-ukraine-nato-chief-112850069.html?ref=gs
    21. PUGLISI, Rosaria. A People's Army: Civil Society as a Security Actor in Post-Maidan Ukraine [online]. IAI WORKING PAPERS, Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), 2015, [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1523.pdf
    22. EICHLER, Jan, Mezinárodní souvislosti války na Ukrajině, Vojenské rozhledy, 2015, roč. 24 (56), č. 1, s. 5-19, ISSN 1210-3292 (tištěná verze), ISSN 2336-2995 (on-line), dostupné z www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    23. CROSS, Sharyl. NATO-Russia security challenges in the aftermath of Ukraine conflict: managing Black Sea security and beyond, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 2015, č. 15(2), str. 161. ISSN 1468-3857
    24. HAUKKALA, Hiski. From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU-Russia Relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015, 23(1), str. 35. ISSN 1478-2804
    25. COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No 692/2014 of 23 June 2014 concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. [online]. Evropská unie [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02014R0692-20141220&qid=1444987014323&from=EN
    26. HAUKKALA, Hiski. From Cooperative to Contested Europe? The Conflict in Ukraine as a Culmination of a Long-Term Crisis in EU-Russia Relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015, 23(1), str. 35. ISSN 1478-2804
    27. KROPATCHEVA, Elena. The Evolution of Russia's OSCE Policy: From the Promises of the Helsinki Final Act to the Ukrainian Crisis, Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015, č. 23(1), str. 18. ISSN 1478-2804
    28. SHELEST, Hanna. After the Ukrainian crisis: Is there a place for Russia? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2015, č. 15(2). str. 191-201. ISSN 1468-3857
    29. SAMMUT, Dennis a Joseph D'URSO. The Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine: A Useful but Flawed OSCE Tool [online]. Policy Brief, European Policy Centre, 2015 [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://aei.pitt.edu/63784/1/pub_5511_the_special_monitoring_mission_in_ukraine.pdf
    30. KROPATCHEVA, Elena. The Evolution of Russia's OSCE Policy: From the Promises of the Helsinki Final Act to the Ukrainian Crisis, Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2015, č. 23(1), str. 16. ISSN 1478-2804
    31. OSCE to send military and civilian personnel to Ukraine [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/sg/116093
    32. SAMMUT, Dennis a Joseph D'URSO. The Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine: A Useful but Flawed OSCE Tool [online]. Policy Brief, European Policy Centre, 2015 [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://aei.pitt.edu/63784/1/pub_5511_the_special_monitoring_mission_in_ukraine.pdf
    33. Götz, Elias. It´s geopolitics, stupid: explaining Russia´s Ukraine policy, Global Affairs, 2015. str. 3-10. ISSN 2334-0460
    34. Canada Leads Verification Team in Ukraine [online]. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.canadiandefencereview.com/news.php/news/1474
    35. ANTHONY, Ian. Damage limitation for Vienna document [online]. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.sipri.org/media/expert-comments/anthony-november-2015
    36. Decision on Deployment of an OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine (OSCE PC Decision No. 1117) (2014) [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/pc/116747?download=true
    37. Russian Checkpoints Gukovo and Donetsk [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/om
    38. OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/ukraine
    39. OSCE response to the crisis in and around Ukraine [online] Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/home/125575?download=trueOSCE; Helping to build Ukraine's new police force. [online] Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/ukraine/202876
    40. SAMMUT, Dennis a Joseph D'URSO. The Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine: A Useful but Flawed OSCE Tool [online]. Policy Brief, European Policy Centre, 2015 [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://aei.pitt.edu/63784/1/pub_5511_the_special_monitoring_mission_in_ukraine.pdf
    41. SAMMUT, Dennis a Joseph D'URSO. The Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine: A Useful but Flawed OSCE Tool [online]. Policy Brief, European Policy Centre, 2015 [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://aei.pitt.edu/63784/1/pub_5511_the_special_monitoring_mission_in_ukraine.pdf
    42. LEHNE, Stefan. Reviving the OSCE: European Security and the Ukraine Crisis [online]. Carnegie Europe - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2015. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://carnegieeurope.eu/2015/09/22/reviving-osce-european-security-and-ukraine-crisis/ii06
    43. OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine - The Facts. [online] Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/ukraine-smm/116879
    44. Permanent Council Decision No. 1130 [online] Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/pc/121826
    45. LEHNE, Stefan. Reviving the OSCE: European Security and the Ukraine Crisis [online]. Carnegie Europe - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2015. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://carnegieeurope.eu/2015/09/22/reviving-osce-european-security-and-ukraine-crisis/ii06
    46. SHELEST, Hanna. After the Ukrainian crisis: Is there a place for Russia?. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2015, č. 15(2). str. 191-201. ISSN 1468-3857
    47. LEHNE, Stefan. Reviving the OSCE: European Security and the Ukraine Crisis [online]. Carnegie Europe - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2015. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://carnegieeurope.eu/2015/09/22/reviving-osce-european-security-and-ukraine-crisis/ii06
    48. Memorandum of September 19 2014 outlining the parameters for the implementation of commitments of the Minsk Protocol of 5 September 2014 [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/home/123806
    49. OSCE response to the crisis in and around Ukraine [online]. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://www.osce.org/home/125575?download=true
    50. LEHNE, Stefan. Reviving the OSCE: European Security and the Ukraine Crisis [online]. Carnegie Europe - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2015 [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://carnegieeurope.eu/2015/09/22/reviving-osce-european-security-and-ukraine-crisis/ii06
    51. EICHLER, Jan, Černomořská dimenze války na Ukrajině, Vojenské rozhledy, 2016, roč. 25 (57), č.1, s. 6-23, ISSN 1210-3292 (tištěná verze), ISSN 2336-2995 (on-line). Dostupné z: www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    52. MEARSHEIMER, John J., Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault, Foreign Affairs, 2014. ISSN 0015-7120
    53. POLYAKOV, Leonid I. US-Ukraine military relations and the value of interoperability. Strategic Studies Institute. U.S. Army War College. 2004
    54. FILIPCHUK, Vasyl a Amanda PAUL. EU Ministers should Discuss Peacekeepers for Ukraine [online]. EUobserver. 20. únor 2014. [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: https://euobserver.com/news/123215
    55. Podobně je tomu u OBSE, kde jsou rozhodnutí přijímána konsensem. Dubský, Zbyněk. Bezpečnostní a strategická kultura OBSE. In: Eichler, Jan, aj. Bezpečnostní a strategická kultura mezinárodních organizací a ČLR. Praha: Nakladatelství Oeconomica. 2013. ISBN 9788024519920
    56. BERDAL, Mats a David H. UCKO. The Use of Force in UN Peacekeeping Operations, The RUSI Journal, 2015, č. 160(1), str. 6-12. ISSN 0307-1847
    57. NOVÁKY, Niklas I.M.. Why so Soft? The European Union in Ukraine, Contemporary Security Policy. 2015. č. 36(2), str. 244-266. ISSN 1352-3260; FREEDMAN, Lawrence (2014), Ukraine and the Art of Crisis Management, The International Institute for Strategic Studies. Survival Global Politics and Strategy. 2014, č. 56 (3), str. 7-42. ISSN 0039-6338
    58. ZAREMBO, Kateryna. Policy Brief - EUAM's First Year: Ambitions versus Reality [online]. Institute od World Policy. 2015 [cit. 2016-04-24]. Dostupné z: http://pasos.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/policy_brif_EUAM_eng_2.pdf

    Zpět na obsah