Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 4/2022: 23-36

Innovative view of the methodical process of facing disinformationReviewed - Research

Martin Havlík

The article describes an innovative view of a possible methodical process of access and protection against disinformation. The ever-increasing digitization and use of cyberspace to disseminate all kinds of data and information provides users with an indisputable number of associated benefits associated with rapid access, distribution or sharing of current knowledge. However, this development trend also reciprocally generates a number of related threats that need to be faced. Our own resilience and effective tools against information campaigns and information actions of all relevant actors play the key role here. The critical thinking itself and the process mechanisms used to access information are the focus of overall resilience to this type of security threats. Thus, the methodical process can help a wide range of readers broaden their view of the complexity of the problem and partially minimize the associated security risks.

Keywords: Information; Disinformation; Threat; Defence; Process.

Published: December 15, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Havlík, M. (2022). Innovative view of the methodical process of facing disinformation. Czech Military Review, 103(4), 23-36
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. MILLER, George, A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (3). 141-144.
    2. NAGASAKO, Tomoko. Global disinformation campaigns and legal challenges. Int. Cybersecur. Law Rev. 1, 125-136. 2020. [online]. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.1365/s43439-020-00010-7>[Accessed 6 April 2022].
    3. DRULÁK, Petr. Jak zkoumat politiku: kvalitativní metodologie v politologii a mezinárodních vztazích. Praha, Portál, 2008. ISBN 978-80-7367-385-7. 256 s.
    4. Cambridge Dictionary - Empirical. Cambridge University Press. 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/empirical> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    5. SANTOS d'AMORIM, Karen, MÁJORY, Miranda. Misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation: clarifying the definitions and examples in disinfodemic times. Encontros Bibli Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação. 2021. [online]. Available at: <DOI:10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e76900> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    6. Oxford University Press. Disinformation - Oxford Reference. 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095721660> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    7. The Britanica Dictionary. Disinformation. 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/disinformation> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    8. Dictionary.com, LLC. - Disinformation Definition. 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://www.dictionary.com/browse/disinformation> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    9. KUJAWSKI, Mike. Misinformation vs. Disinformation vs. Mal-information. 2019. [online]. Available at: <https://medium.com/@mikekujawski/misinformation-vs-disinformation-vs-mal-information-a2b741410736>; [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    10. Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Council of Europe report DGI. 2017. [online]. Available at: <https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-forresearc/168076277c> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    11. HELVOORT, Jos van, HERMANS, Marianne. Effectiveness Of Educational Approaches To Elementary School Pupils (11 Or 12 Years Old) To Combat Fake News. Media Literacy and Academic Research. Vol. 3, No. 2, 2020. [online]. Available at: <https://www.mlar.sk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/3_Helvoort_Hermans.pdf> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    12. Netbox - Co jsou cookies? 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://www.netbox.cz/cookies> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    13. Resist 2 - Counter-disinformation Toolkit. Government Communication Service. UK. 2021. [online]. Available at: <https://gcs.civilservice.gov.uk/publications/resist-2-counter-disinformation-toolkit/> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    14. Ministerstvo vnitra ČR. Centrum proti terorismu a hybridním hrozbám. 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://www.mvcr.cz/cthh/clanek/ke-stazeni-resist-prirucka-pro-boj-s-dezinformacemi.aspx> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    15. HAVLÍK, Martin. Dissemination of misleading Information and elimination of risks resulting from them. 2017. [online]. Available at: <https://1url.cz/Pr1Cn> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    16. Automated tackling of disinformation. Brussels. European Union - European Parliamentary Research Service. 2019. ISBN 978-92-846-3945-8.
    17. Evropská komise. Financované projekty zabývající se bojem proti dezinformacím. 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/fighting-disinformation/funded-projects-fight-against-disinformation_cs#jin-vsouasn-dob-pouvan-nstroje> [Accessed 6 April 2022].
    18. European Commission. Tackling online disinformation. 2022. [online]. Available at: <https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/online-disinformation> [Accessed 6 April 2022].

    Return to the content