Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 2/2020: 37-48

Efficiency of Language Education at the Language Center of the University of DefenceReviewed - Research

Mária Šikolová, Vladan Holcner

During the period between 2016 and 2019, the efficiency of language courses was scrutinized by invention methods. In 2019, the language requirements were set to 14 958 positions in the Czech Armed Forces (60.69 %). Out of the given number of positions, the language requirement was met by only 6 414 professional soldiers, i.e. 42.88 %. The results of the language courses vary a lot depending on the required level of language proficiency; the courses designed to prepare the learners for SLP 1111 and SLP 2222 had the success rate around 60 %, however, the success rate of the courses for SLP 3333 was rather lower (38 %). Out of five groups of factors affecting the success rate, the relative significance of 22 factors was assessed. Most of the critically significant factors concerned the organization of language education; some of the critically significant factors were as follows: placement testing, flexibility of the syllabus and familiarization with the exam format and assessment criteria.

Keywords: English; Language Teaching; Factor of Success Rate; Examination in Accordance with STANAG 6001.

Published: June 15, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šikolová, M., & Holcner, V. (2020). Efficiency of Language Education at the Language Center of the University of Defence. Czech Military Review101(2), 37-48
Download citation

References

  1. SNOW, D. M. National Security for a New Era. New York: Routledge, 2014. 402 s. ISBN 978-0-205-94122-3. s. 194-199.
  2. OLEJNÍČEK, A., ODEHNAL, J., HOLCNER, V., KRČ, M.. Determinants of Military Robotics Proliferation. Advances in Military Technology, 13 (1), 2018. s. 71-86. ISSN 1802-2308.
  3. SCHMIDT. N. Neither Conventional War, nor a Cyber War, but a Long-Lasting and Silent Hybrid War. Obrana a strategie. 14 (2), 2014. s. 73-86. ISSN 1214-6463.
  4. MINISTERSTVO OBRANY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY. Rozkaz ministra obrany č. 108 ze dne 25. listopadu 2014 ve znění RMO č. 61/2015 Věstníku (1. novela), ve znění RMO č. 88/2015 Věstníku (2. novela), Jazykové vzdělávání zaměstnanců v působnosti rezortu Ministerstva obrany. Praha: Ministerstvo obrany, 2015.
  5. CHRÁSKA, M. Didaktické testy. Brno: Paido, 1999. 91 s. ISBN 80-85931-68-0. s. 16.
  6. HUGHES, A. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: University Press, 2013. 251 s. 978-3-12-533876-0. s. 13.
  7. ČECHOVÁ, I., NEUBAUER, J., SEDLAČÍK, M. Computer-Adaptive Testing: Item Analysis and Statistics for Effective Testing. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on e-Learning ECEL-2014. Copenhagen: Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014, s. 106-112. ISBN 978-1-910309-67-4.
  8. CHRÁSKA, M. Didaktické testy. Brno: Paido, 1999. 91 s. ISBN 80-85931-68-0. s. 15-16.
  9. SHOHAMY, E. The Power of Tests. Longman, Pearson Education Limited, 2001. 181 s. 0-582-42335-X. s. 15-16.
  10. MINISTERSTVO OBRANY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY. Statistická ročenka 2017. Praha: Agentura personalistiky AČR, 2018. s. 38.
  11. MINISTERSTVO OBRANY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY. Statistická ročenka 2018. Praha: Agentura personalistiky AČR, 2019. s. 38.
  12. SMOLÍK, Josef. Prognostické metody bezpečnostních fenoménů. Vojenské rozhledy. 2018, 27 (1), 03-24. ISSN 2336-2995. Dostupné z: <www.vojenskerozhledy.cz>. [cit. 2019-10-06].
  13. MINISTERSTVO OBRANY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY. Statistická ročenka 2017. Praha: Agentura personalistiky AČR, 2018. s. 38.
  14. MINISTERSTVO OBRANY ČESKÉ REPUBLIKY. Statistická ročenka 2018. Praha: Agentura personalistiky AČR, 2019. s. 38.