Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 1/2019: 3-15

Approach to the Assessment of the Military Potential of the State - an Example of the Russian FederationReviewed - Review

Josef Procházka, Richard Stojar

The aim of the text is to present the approach to assessing the military potential of the state as well as the will or possibilities to be used to achieve national strategic interests or power objectives. This approach is methodologically based on the sectoral analysis of the state's power potential and its possible projections in the construction and use of armed forces. The described and used approach in the Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic is applied to the current Russian Federation and its military or power activities

Keywords: Armed forces; Russian Federation; Strategic interests; Military potential.

Published: March 15, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Procházka, J., & Stojar, R. (2019). Approach to the Assessment of the Military Potential of the State - an Example of the Russian Federation. Czech Military Review, 100(1), 3-15
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. MORGENTHAU, Hans J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1978.
    2. LI, X., Eric. The Rise and Fall of the Soft Power. The Foreign Policy. Dostupné z: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/20/the-rise-and-fall-of-soft-power/
    3. FRANK, Libor. Bezpečnostní politika a bezpečnostní strategie státu. LUKÁŠ, Luděk et al. Bezpečnostní technologie, systémy a management II. Zlín, 2012. ISBN 978-80-87500-19-4.
    4. Národní bezpečnostní strategie Ruské Federace. 2014.
    5. GOLTS, Alexander, KOFMAN, Michael. Russia's Military: Assessment, Strategy, and Threat. Centre of Global Interests 2016.
    6. STOJAR, Richard. The Eurasian Union: A New Regional Dimension of Russian Foreign and Security Policy. Bratislava: CENAA 2012, s. 329-331. PANORAMA of global security environment 2012. ISBN 978-80-971124-1-7.
    7. COOPER, Julian. The Russian State Armament Programme, 2018 - 2027. Russian Studies 01/18, s. 14, NATO Defence College 2018.
    8. MONAGHAN, Andrew. Russian State Mobilization. Moving the Country on to a War Footing. Research Paper. Russia and Eurasia Programme, May 2016.
    9. KLEIN, Margarete. Russia's New Military Doctrine. NATO, the United States and the "Colour Revolutions". SWP Comments 9. German Institute for International and Security Affairs 2016.
    10. RASKA, Michael. Debating Military Innovation: The Six Waves of RMA. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2016.
    11. VEN BRUUSGAARD, Kristin. Crimea and Russia´s Strategic Overhaul. Parameters 44(3) Autumn 2014. s. 85.
    12. STOJAR, Richard. Konflikt na Ukrajině a ruský zásah: Nový způsob vedení hybridní války, nebo aplikace klasických postupů? Vojenské rozhledy. (Czech Military Review.), 2015, sv. sv. 24(56), č. 1, s. 26-37. ISSN 1210-3292.
    13. PERSON, Gudrun (eds). Russian Military Capability in a Ten-Year Perspective - 2016. FOI-R-4326-SE, FOI 2016, ISSN 1650-1942.
    14. BARRIE, Douglas, GETHIN, Howard. Russian Weapons in the Syrian Conflict. Russian Studies 02/18, NATO Defence College 2018.
    15. PERSON, Gudrun (eds). Russian Military Capability in a Ten-Year Perspective - 2016. FOI-R-4326-SE, FOI 2016, ISSN 1650-1942.

    Return to the content