Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 1/2017: 3-21

Analysis of NATO and EU Approaches to Capability Planning ProcessReviewed - Review

Ing. Zdeněk Petráš, Ph.D.

The aim of the article is to bring out results of the comparative analysis of NATO and EU defence planning processes. The comparative analysis was focused on identification of those findings which are identical for both NATO and the EU and which might be also beneficial for optimising the national defence planning process within the Czech Ministry of Defence. From this perspective, the key analysis outcome is identification of similar phases which were found out while comparing respective NATO´s and EU´s planning tools, i.e. J-DARTS and SAEP Process. Even if NATO and the EU are using a different terminology and different approaches to achieve expected results, the substance of respective phases is almost identical. A course of action how to implement the analysis outcomes into the national defence planning process might be the subject of a follow on research.

Keywords: NATO; EU; Defence Planning Proces; Capability Planning; Shortfalls; Assessing; Prioritising.

Published: March 15, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Petráš, Z. (2017). Analysis of NATO and EU Approaches to Capability Planning Process. Czech Military Review, 98(1), 3-21
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. PETRÁŠ, Zdeněk. Analýza přístupů vybraných zemí NATO a EU k obrannému plánování a plánování schopností. Vojenské rozhledy. 2016, 25 (4), s. 3-19. ISSN 1210-3292 (print), 2336-2995 (on-line). Dostupné z: www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    2. PETRÁŠ, Zdeněk. Kritická analýza stavu vzájemného propojení plánování pomocí cílů a plánování schopností: Vojenské rozhledy. 2014, 2355(4). ISSN 1210-3292. Dostupné také z: http://www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    3. NATO (ed.). Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATO Public Diplomacy Division, Brusel, Belgie, 2010. Dostupné také z: http://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120214_strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf
    4. MISSIROLI, Antonio (ed.). Towards an EU global strategy: Background, process, references. Paris, France: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2015, 160 s. ISBN 978-92-9198-370-4. DOI:10.2815/953786. Dostupné také z: http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/Towards_an_EU_Global_Strategy.pdf.
    5. DUBEC, Radek; SPIŠÁK, Ján. Východiska tvorby modulárních struktur. Vojenské rozhledy. 2013, sv. XXII, č. 3, s. 38. s. 27-40. ISSN 1210-3292. Dostupné také z: http://www.vojenskerozhledy.cz
    6. MAULNY, Jean-Pierre, Sylvie MATELLY, Fabio LIBERTI. Analyse comparée des planifications capacitaires par pays de l'Union européenne et perspectives pour des orientations communes dans le cadre de la PESD et impact sur les programmations nationales. Les Notes de l'RIS 09/2005. Paris, France: IRIS, 2015. s. 196-211. Dostupné také z: http://www.iris-france.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2005_planification.pdf
    7. COUNCIL OF THE EU (ed.). EU civilian and military capability development beyond 2010. Doc. 17208/1/10. General Secreteriat of the Council, Brussels, Belgium, 2010
    8. DE LANGLOIS, Maurice. OTAN et PSDC : vers un rapprochement des processus capacitaires. Note de recherche stratégique n°20 - juin 2015. Paříž, Francie: IRSEM, 2015, s.1-6. ISSN 2430-598. Dostupné také z: http://www.defense.gouv.fr/actualites/operations/notes-de-recherche-strategique
    9. REHRL, Jochen (ed.), Hans-Bernhard WEISSERTH (ed.). Handbook on CSDP - Common Security and Defence Policy of the EU. 2. Vienna, Austria: Directorate for Security Policy of the Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports of the Republic of Austria, 2013. s. 69-74. ISBN 987-3-902275-34-9.
    10. COUNCIL OF THE EU (ed.). Defining the EU Capability Development Mechanism (CDM). Secretariat General of the Council, 6805/03. Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
    11. COUNCIL OF THE EU (ed.). Defining the Capability development mechanism (CDM). Qualitative Aspects. Brussels, Belgium: Secretariat General of the Council, 2003.
    12. COUNCIL OF THE EU (ed.). Headline Goal 2010. General Secreteriat of the Council. Brussels, Belgium, 2004. Dostupné také z: http://eeas.europa.eu/csdp/capabilities/military-capabilities/index_en.htm
    13. COUNCIL OF THE EU (ed.). Requirement Catalogue 05 (RC05). General Secreteriat of the Council, 13732/05. Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
    14. REHRL, Jochen (ed.), Hans-Bernhard WEISSERTH (ed.). Handbook on CSDP - Common Security and Defence Policy of the EU. 2. Vienna, Austria: Directorate for Security Policy of the Federal Ministry of Defence and Sports of the Republic of Austria, 2013. s. 79. ISBN 987-3-902275-34-9.
    15. HILLMANN, Jörg (ed.). Military Capability Development in the Framework of the Common Security and Defence Policy. Nicosia, Cyprus: Ministry of Defence, Republic of Cyprus, 2012. s. 42. ISBN 9789963748914.
    16. EEAS (ed.). Scrutinising, Assessing, Evaluating and Prioritising Handbook. European External Action Service 00241/1/13. Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
    17. NATO (ed.). The NATO Defence Planning Process. NATO Secretary General, PO(2016)0655 (INV). Brussels, Belgium, 2016. s.1-4.
    18. STEJSKAL, Jan. Obranné plánování NATO (neustále) v tranzici. Vojenské rozhledy. Praha: MO ČR, 2013/4, 22(4), s. 76. Dostupné také z: http://www.vojenskerozhledy.cz/kategorie/obranne-planovani-nato-neustale-v-tranzici?highlight=WyJqYW4iLCJzdGVqc2thbCIsImphbiBzdGVqc2thbCJd
    19. NATO Allied Command Transformation (ed.). Concept Development and Experimentation Handbook. HQ SACT, Capability Engineering and Innovation. Norfolk, Virginia, USA, 2013.
    20. JALLC (ed.). Motivating Improved Contributions to the Alliance: Defence Measurements - Final Report. Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre, JALLC/CG/11/168. Lisbon, Portugal, 2011.
    21. JALLC (ed.). Defence Measurements: A Composite Metrics Approach. Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre, JALLC/CG/11/218. Lisbon, Portugal, 2011.
    22. GLARUM, Sigurd, Alf-Christian HENNUM. RTO-MP-SAS-081 - Analytical Support to Defence Transformation: J-DARTS - An End-to-End Defence Planning Tool Set. Paris, France: NATO Science and Technology Organization, 2010, 404 s. ISBN 978-92-837-0116-3. Dostupné také z: http://www.cso.nato.int/abstracts.aspx?pg=2&RestrictPanel=6&SearchString=&RestrictRDP=0&Authors
    23. EUMC (ed.). Methodology for Measuring Progress and Reviewing Priorities. Secreteriat of the Council, 16531/08. Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
    24. NATO (ed.). Defence Planning Capability Survey 2010. AC/281-N(2010)0014-FINAL (EWG(R)). Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
    25. SHAPE/ACT (ed.). BI-SC Agreed Capability Codes and Capability Statements. SHAPE/CPPCAMFCR/JM/281143. Mons, Belgium, 2011.
    26. SHAPE/ACT (ed.). Bi-SC Capability Hierarchy. SH/PLANS/JCAP/FCP/15-310118. Mons, Belgium, 2015.

    Return to the content