Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 3/2015: 62-80

Islamist Territorially Anchored Violent Non-State Actor in the International SystemReviewed - Review

Mgr. Zdeněk Ludvík

Islamist territorially anchored violent non-state actors (ITAVNSAs) seeking to change the status quo of the current international system constitute one of the greatest challenges the international order based on mutual respect of equal sovereign states. These actors in areas without the presence of power states use explicit cross-border violence to achieve their objective in accordance with universal Islamist ideology - the construction of a caliphate. The paper presents in the theoretical and modern historical perspectives methods of reduction of anarchy in the international system - power, economic, legalistic and normative - and highlights the reasons why face to face of these actors, these heretofore functional ways, be it on a regional or system level of analysis, fail.

Keywords: Islamističtí teritoriálně ukotvení násilní nestátní aktéři (ITUNNA), moderní teritoriální stát, mezinárodní systém, změna mezinárodního řádu, regulativní mechanismy mezinárodní anarchie Islamist Territorially Anchored Violent Non-State Actors (Itavnsas), Modern Territorial State, International Systém, Change Of International Order, Regulatory Mechanisms Of International Anarchy.

Published: September 15, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ludvík, Z. (2015). Islamist Territorially Anchored Violent Non-State Actor in the International System. Czech Military Review, 96(3), 62-80
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. GALTUNG, Johan (1969): Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, No. 3., s. 183.
    2. MULAJ, Klejda: Introduction: Violent Non-State Actors: Exploring their State Relations, Legitimation, and Operationality. In: Mulaj, Klejda (ed.) (2010): Violent non-state actors in world politics. London: Hurst
    3. SCHNECKENER, Ulrich (2006): Fragile Statehood, Armed Non-State Actors and Security Governance. In: Bryden, Alan - Caparini, Marina (eds.): Private Actors and Security Governance. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces
    4. WILLIAMS, Phil (2008): Violent Non-state Actors and National and International Security. Zürich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule.
    5. FJELDE, Hanne - NILSSON, Desirée (2012): Rebels against Rebels: Explaining Violence between Rebel Groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 56, No. 4, s. 607
    6. MANDEL, Robert (2013): Global Security Upheaval: Armed Nonstate Groups Usurping State Stability Functions. Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 38.
    7. ROTBERG, Robert I. (nedatováno): Nation-State Failure A Recurring Phenomenon. The Air University [online]: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cia/nic2020/panel2_nov6.pdf, s. 2-4.
    8. OKUMU, Wafula - IKELEGBE, Augustine (2010): Confronting the threats of armed non-state groups to human security and the state in Africa. In: Okumu, Wafula - Ikelegbe, Augustine: Militias, Rebels and Islamist Militants: Human Insecurity and State Crises in Africa. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies, s. 439
    9. HALL, Rodney B. - BIERSTEKER, Thomas J. (2002): The emergence of private authority in the international system. In: Hall, Rodney B. - Biersteker, Thomas J. (eds.): The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, s. 16
    10. MANDEL 2013, s. 72-73; Srovnej RISSE, Thomas (ed.) (2011): Governance Without a State: Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press
    11. CLUNAN, Anne L. - TRINKUNAS, Harold A. (eds.) (2010): Ungoverned Spaces: Alternatives to State Authority in an Era of Softened Sovereignty. Stanford: Stanford University Press; MANDEL 2013.
    12. BARAK, Oren - COHEN, Chanan: The "Modern Sherwood Forest": Theoretical and Practical Challenges. In: Miodownik, Dan - Barak, Oren (eds.): Nonstate Actors in Intrastate Conflicts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014, s. 14-15.
    13. KROPÁČEK, Luboš (1996): Islámský fundamentalismus. Praha: Vyšehrad, s. 26-32.
    14. CLUNAN, Anne L. - TRINKUNAS, Harold A. (2010a): Alternative Governance and Security. In: Clunan, Anne L. - Trinkunas, Harold A. (eds.): Ungoverned Spaces: Alternatives to State Authority in an Era of Softened Sovereignty. Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 286
    15. BARAK - COHEN 2014, s. 15-16; VENNESSON, Pascal (2007): Europe's Grand Strategy: The Search for a Postmodern Realism. In: Casarini, Nicola - Musu, Costanza (eds.): European Foreign Policy in an Evolving International System: The Road Towards Convergence. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 18.
    16. NIOU, Emerson M.S. - ORDESHOOK, Peter C. (1986): A Theory of the Balance of Power in International System. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 30, No. 4, s. 685.
    17. NIOU, Emerson M.S. - ORDESHOOK, Peter C. - ROSE, Gregory F. (1989): The Balance of Power: Stability in International System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 63.
    18. PAUL, T.V. (2004): Introduction: The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory and Their Contemporary Relevance. In: Paul, T.V. - Wirtz, James J. - Fortmann, Michel: Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 2.
    19. MORGENTHAU, Hans J. (1948): Politics among Nation: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, s. 125
    20. IKENBERRY, G. John (2001): After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, s. 25-26.
    21. LAYNE, Christopher (2004): The War on Terrorism and the Balance of Power: The Paradoxes of American Hegemony. In: Paul, T.V. - Wirtz, James J. - Fortmann, Michel: Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 113.
    22. LEVY, Jack S. - THOMPSON, William R. (2010): Causes of War. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, s. 44
    23. GILPIN, Robert - GILPIN, Jean M. (2001): Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton, Woodstock: Princeton University Press, s. 100.
    24. WALT, Stephen M. (1987): The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, s. 5, 17
    25. PAUL 2004, s. 8; HURD, Ian (1999): Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 2, s. 394-395.
    26. HURD 1999, s. 385-387; KEOHANE, Robert O. (1984): After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, s. 51-52, 89-92
    27. AXELROD, Robert - KEOHANE, Robert O. (1985): Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1., s. 228-232, 244-247.
    28. JERVIS, Robert (1999): Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1, s. 45.
    29. ABBOTT, Kenneth W. - SNIDAL, Duncan (1998): Why States Act through Formal International Organizations. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 42, No. 1, s. 4, 10, 16.
    30. GOUREVITCH, Peter (1978): The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics. International Organization, Vol. 32, No. 4, s. 892, 908
    31. MAKARIUSOVÁ, Radana (2010): Transformace světového řádu: aktéři a globální vládnutí. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk
    32. STRANGE, Susan (1998): The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, s. 3-7
    33. CLARK, Cat - CHAN, Steve (1995): MNCs and Developmentalism: Domestic Structure as an Explanation for East Asian Dynamism. In: Risse-Kappen, Thomas: Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 112.
    34. BULL, Hedley (1977): The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave, s. 13, 25.
    35. HURD 1999, s. 397-399; HATHAWAY, Oona A. (2005): Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law. Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 836, s. 477-483
    36. BARADAN, Shima (et al.) (2013): Does International Law Matter? Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 743, s. 751-760
    37. WENDT, Alexander (1999): Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, s. 280-281.
    38. BOLI, John (1999): Conclusion: World Authority Structures and Legitimations. In: Boli, John - Thomas, George M. (eds.): Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 298
    39. LECHNER, Frank J. - BOLI, John (2005): World Culture: Origins and Consequences. Oxford: Blackwell, s. 87, 188.
    40. FINNEMORE, Martha (1996b): Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 2, s. 334.
    41. MEYER, John W. (et al.) (1997): World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 1, s. 147-148, 151
    42. MARCH, James G. - OLSEN, Johan P. (1998): The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, s. 951-952.
    43. FEARON, James - WENDT, Alexander (2002): Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In: Simmons, Beth A. - Carlsnaes Walter - Risse, Thomas (eds.): Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, s. 61.
    44. SPRUYT, Hendrik (1994): Institutional Selection in International Relations: State Anarchy as Order. International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 4, s. 557.
    45. WENDT, Alexander (1992): Anarchy Is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2, s. 400.
    46. WENDT 1992, s. 400, 408; HURD 1999, s. 387-388; BARNETT, Michael (1996): Sovereignty, Nationalism, and Regional Order in the Arab States System. In: Biersteker, Thomas J. - Weber, Cynthia (eds.): State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge, Oakleigh: Cambridge University Press, s. 155.
    47. HALL, John A. - PAUL, T.V. (1999): Introduction. In: Paul, T.V. - Hall, John A.: International Order and the Future of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 4
    48. BUZAN, Barry - WAEVER, Ole (2003): Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 27-51.
    49. KNUTSEN, Torbjørn L. (2005): Dějiny teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Brno: Barrister & Principal, s. 139.
    50. KNUTSEN 2005, s. 127; COOPER, Robert (2000): The Post-Modern State and the World Order. London: Demos, s. 11-12.
    51. KISSINGER, Henry (1999): Umění diplomacie: od Richelieua k pádu Berlínské zdi. Praha: Prostor, s. 11, 53-228
    52. NIOU - ORDESHOOK - ROSE 1989, s. 209-211; VASQUEZ, John A. (2004): The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 305
    53. FABER, Jan - WEAVER, R. (1984): Participation in Conferences, Treaties, and Warfare in the European System, 1816-1915. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 28, No. 3, s. 525
    54. LUDVÍK, Zdeněk (2014a): Příčiny první světové války. Nepublikovaná esej
    55. HOLSTI, Kalevi J. (1991): Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 25-174.
    56. DRULÁK, Petr (2003): Teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Praha: Portál, s. 25
    57. KISSINGER 1999, s. 259-401; GILBERT, Felix - LARGE, David C. (2003): Konec evropské éry: dějiny Evropy 1890-1990. Praha: Mladá fronta, s. 200-204
    58. MARKS, Sally (2003): The Illusion of Peace: International Relations in Europe 1918-1933. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, s. 29-62
    59. NEILSON, Keith (2006): Britain, Soviet Russia and the Collapse of the Versailles Order, 1919-1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 12-13, 50-51
    60. CARR, Edward H. (1946): The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan, s. 193-206
    61. MORAVCOVÁ, Dagmar - BĚLINA, Pavel (1998): Kapitoly z dějin mezinárodních vztahů 1914-1941. Praha: Institut pro středoevropskou kulturu a politiku, s. 104.
    62. KUČEROVÁ, Irah (2008): Mezinárodní ekonomické vztahy - repetitorium. Praha: MUP, s. 13-15
    63. KEOHANE 1984, s. 136 a násl.; JENÍČEK, Vladimír (2002): Globalizace světového hospodářství. Praha: C. H. Beck, s. 14-15.
    64. COOPER 2000, s. 13; MORGAN, Patrick M. - PAUL, T. V. (2009): Deterrence among Great Powers in an Era of Globalization. In: Paul,T. V. - Morgan, Patrick M. - Wirtz, James J. (eds.): Complex Deterrence. Strategy in the Global Age. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, s. 260-263
    65. WYATT-WALTER, Andrew (1996): The United States and Western Europe: The Theory of Hegemonic Stability. In: Woods, Ngaire (ed.): Explaining International Relations Since 1945, Oxford: Oxford University Press, s.126-154.
    66. TANNENWALD, Nina (2007): The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    67. HUNTINGTON, Samuel P. (2003): America in the World. Hedgehog Revue, Vol. 5, No. 1
    68. LUDVÍK, Zdeněk (2012): Polarita mezinárodního systému v proměnách globálního věku transnacionálních vztahů. Mezinárodní politika, Vol. 36, No. 3.
    69. CHANDLER, David (2006): Empire in Denial: The Politics of State-building. London, Ann Arbor: Pluto Press, s. 8-19
    70. BARNETT, Michael - DUVALL, Raymond (2005): Power in International Politics. International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 1.
    71. GREVI, Giovanni (2009): The Interpolar World: A New Scenario. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, Occasional paper No. 79, s 24
    72. KUNEŠOVÁ, Hana (2006): Globalizace světové ekonomiky. In: Kunešová, Hana - CIHELKOVÁ, Eva (eds.): Světová ekonomika: nové jevy a perspektivy. Praha: C. H. Beck, s. 28.
    73. KEOHANE, Robert O. (2012): Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism. International Relations, Vol. 26, No. 2.
    74. SINGER, Peter (2011): Is Violence History? The New York Times, 6.11. 2011.
    75. DOYLE, Michael (1983): Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 3
    76. BYMAN, Daniel L. - POLLACK, Kenneth M. (2001): Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In. International Security, Vol. 25, No. 4.
    77. LEBOW, Richard N. (2010): Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 66-77, 206.
    78. FINNEMORE 1993, 1996a: National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, NewYork: Cornell University Press, 1996b
    79. FINNEMORE, Martha - SIKKINK, Kathryn (1998): International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4
    80. KECK, MARGARET E. - FINNEMORE, Martha (1998): Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NewYork: Cornell University Press
    81. KECK, MARGARET E. - SIKKINK, Kathryn (1999): Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics. International Social Science Journal, Vol. 51, No. 159.
    82. GOLDSTEIN, Joshua (2011): Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. New York: Penguin
    83. WALLENSTEEN, Peter - SOLLENBERG, Margareta (2000): Armed Conflict, 1989-99. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 37, No. 5.
    84. RAMSBOTHAM, Oliver - WOODHOUSE, Tom - MIALL, Hugh (2007): Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity, s. 61
    85. BLUTH, Christoph (2004): Norms and International Relations: The anachronistic nature of neo-realist approaches. Polis, Working Paper No. 12, s. 25.
    86. ANDERSEN, David R. (2004): Foreign Policy Decision-Making and Violent Non-State Actors. Dizertační práce, University of Maryland
    87. ROTHOLZ, Josh (2013): Breaking the Rules: The Effect of Violent Non-State Actors on the International System of States, dostupné z: http://www.academia.edu/7638021/Breaking_the_Rules_The_Effect_of_Violent_Non-State_Actors_on_the_International_System_of_States
    88. CLUNAN - TRINKUNAS 2010a; RISSE, Thomas (2011a): Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood: Introduction and Overview. In: Risse, Thomas (ed.): Governance Without a State: Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press
    89. CHOJNACKI, Sven - BRANOVIC, Zeljko (2011): New Modes of Security: The Violent Making and Unmaking of Governance in War-Torn Areas of Limited Statehood. In: Risse, Thomas (ed.): Governance Without a State: Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press
    90. LUDVÍK, Zdeněk (2014b): Případ Severního Mali (Azawadu) 2012-13: stát a jeho vytěsnění alternativní autoritou. Obrana a strategie, Vol. 14, No. 2.
    91. THOMAS, Troy S. - KISER, Stephen D. - CASEBEER, William D. (2005): Warlords Rising: Confronting Violent Non-State Actors. Lanham: Lexington Books, s. 186-187
    92. PAUL 2004, s. 13; LAYNE 2004, s. 109; PAUL 2004, s. 16; typickým příkladem budiž Američany vedená koalice států provádějící selektivní vzdušné údery proti Islámskému státu.
    93. FORTMANN, Michel - PAUL, T.V. - WIRTZ, James J. (2004): Conclusions: Balance of Power at the Turn of the New Century. In: Paul, T.V. - Wirtz, James J. - Fortmann, Michel: Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century. Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 365
    94. WALTON, Dale C. (2007): Geopolitics and the Great Powers in the 21st century: Multipolarity and the Revolution in Strategic Perspective. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, s. 106-107
    95. FERGUSON, Niall (2004): Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire. New York: Penguin, s. 27; jak v posledním desetiletí minulého století a na přelomu tisíciletí učinily tehdy hegemonické Spojené státy např. proti Tálibánu a al-Káidě.
    96. LEBOW 2010, s. 198; KNOPF, Jeffrey W. (2009): Three Items in One: Deterrence as Concept, Research Program, and Political Issue. In: Paul,T. V. - Morgan, Patrick M. - Wirtz, James J. (eds.): Complex Deterrence. Strategy in the Global Age. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, s. 37.
    97. The Guardian (2014): Inside Islamic State's oil empire: how captured oilfields fuel Isis insurgency. 19.11. 2014, dostupné z: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/19/-sp-islamic-state-oil-empire-iraq-isis
    98. Newsweek (2014): How Does ISIS Fund Its Reign of Terror? 6.11. 2014, dostupné z: http://www.newsweek.com/2014/11/14/how-does-isis-fund-its-reign-terror-282607.html
    99. The New York Times (2014a): Turkey Crackdown on Oil Smugglers Feeding IS Group. 6.10. 2014, dostupné z: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014/10/06/world/europe/ap-eu-turkey-oil-smuggling.html?ref=world
    100. The New York Times (2014b): U.S. Strikes Cut Into ISIS Oil Revenues, Treasury Official Says. 23.10. 2014, dostupné z: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/world/middleeast/us-strikes-cut-into-isis-oil-revenues-treasury-official-says.html?ref=world&gwh=354167FADA6754CEDE3797F986C314DF&gwt=pay&assetType=nyt_now.
    101. GLENNON, Michael J. (1999): The New Interventionism: The Search for a Just International Law. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 3, s. 3.
    102. SVEINBJÖRNSSON, Davíð Ö. (2009): The Non-State Actor Threat. Dizertační práce, Lagadeild Háskóla Íslands; MIRETSKI, Pini P. (2009): Delegitimizing or Evolving? The Legality of UN Security Council Resolutions Imposing Duties on Non-State Actors, dostupné z: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1963689_code1134338.pdf?abstractid=1963689&mirid=1.
    103. BOON, Kristen (2013): UN Sanctions Against Rebels Here to Stay, dostupné z: http://theglobalobservatory.org/2013/02/un-sanctions-against-rebels-here-to-stay.
    104. LUBELL, Noam (2010): Extraterritorial Use of Force Against Non-State Actors. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, s. 81-82
    105. KU, Charlotte - JACOBSON, Harold K. (2003a): Broaching the Issues. In: Ku, Charlotte - Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.): Democratic Accountability and the Use of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss, s. 26
    106. GORMAN, Fitzalan C. (2009): Non-State Actors, Terrorism and the United Nations: A Critical Analysis through three Case Studies Examining the United Nations' Effectiveness in Addressing the Threat Imposed by Violent Non-State Actors. Magisterská práce, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, s. 49-50.
    107. MORGAN, Patrick M. (2009): CollectiveActor Deterrence. In: Paul,T. V. - Morgan, Patrick M. - Wirtz, James J. (eds.): Complex Deterrence. Strategy in the Global Age. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, s. 170
    108. RAMSBOTHAM - WOODHOUSE - MIALL 2007, s. 12-14; KILCULLEN, David (2004): Countering Global Insurgency, dostupné z: http://www.academia.edu/7026837/Countering_global_insurgency, s. 30.
    109. CHECKEL, Jeffrey T. (2001). Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 3, s. 562-563.
    110. FELBAB-BROWN,Vanda (2010): Rules and Regulations in Ungoverned Spaces: Illicit Economies, Criminals, and Belligerents. In: Clunan, Anne L. - Trinkunas, Harold A. (eds.). Ungoverned Spaces: Alternatives to State Authority in an Era of Softened Sovereignty. Stanford: Stanford University Press, s. 189.
    111. GORMAN 2009, s. 128; srovnej KU, Charlotte - JACOBSON, Harold K. (2003b): Toward a mixed system of democratic accountability. In: Ku, Charlotte - Jacobson, Harold K. (eds.): Democratic Accountability and the Use of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Presss, s. 355.
    112. IDLER, Annette - FOREST, James J. F. (2015). Behavioral Patterns among (Violent) Non-State Actors: A Study of Complementary Governance. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, Vol. 4, No. 1, s. 14.
    113. BUZAN, Barry (1983): People, States, and Fear. The National Security Problem in International Relations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books
    114. BUZAN, Barry - WAEVER, Ole - WILDE, Jaap de (1998): Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    115. ZELINKA, Petr (2008): Kritika teorie bezpečnostního komplexu z hlediska přístupu síťových aktérů. Mezinárodní vztahy, Vol. 43, No. 4, s. 63.
    116. Le Monde (2012): Mali: les députés Haïdara de Tombouctou et Bourem lancent un SOS [on-line]. Dostupné z: http://africamix.blog.lemonde.fr/2012/10/26/mali-les-deputes-haidara-de-tombouctou-et-bourem-lancent-un-sos
    117. Le Monde (2013): Pour le président tchadien, la Libye est au bord de l'explosion [on-line]. Dostupné z: http://www.lemonde.fr/libye/article/2013/06/08/pour-le-president-tchadien-la-libye-est-au-bord-de-l-explosion_3426705_1496980.html
    118. The Guardian (2014): Syrian Kurds plea for help defending Kobani from Isis advance [on-line]. Dostupné z: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/03/syrian-kurds-plea-for-help-kobani-isis-advance.
    119. BUZAN, Barry - HANSEN, Lene (2009): The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 216.
    120. SlateAfrique (2015). "Boko Haram est décapité", affirme le président tchadien Deby [on-line]. Dostupné z: http://www.slateafrique.com/602663/boko-haram-est-decapite-affirme-le-president-tchadien-deby
    121. New York Times (2015). Nigeria: Boko Haram Is Said to Have a New Leader [on-line]. Dostupné z: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/13/world/africa/nigeria-boko-haram-is-said-to-have-a-new-leader.html?ref=world.
    122. TISSERON, Antonin (2011): Enchevêtrements géopolitiques autour de la lutte contre le terrorisme dans le Sahara. Hérodote: Revue de géographie et de géopolitique. Vol. neuvedeno, No. 3, s. 104
    123. SHAW, Scott (2013): Fallout in the Sahel: The Geographic Spread of Conflict from Libya to Mali. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, s. 207

    Return to the content