Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 3/2012: 17-29

Legal and Illegal Wars in Present-day WorldReviewed - Research

Doc. PhDr. Jan Eichler, CSc.

After the year 1990 a total of 120 wars have taken place. The most appealing were those initiated by the USA, in which other friendly states´ve participated as well. No country has the right to invade its neighbour or over-run and annex another. There were many discussions in the world over the legacy of imposed interventions, under which conditions they are true and just. The study covers two dissimilar attitudes: the first one against Hussein's expansionist policy in 1991 and warfare after 9/11 2001. The legitimacy rests upon Resolutions of the United Nations Security Council that allow any nation to remove the aggressor by force. The author also mentions a series of wars, fought throughout the former Yugoslavia from 1991 to 1995, and then again from 1998 until 1999/2001.

Keywords: legitimity,nato,armed conficts,us,war

Published: September 15, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Eichler, J. (2012). Legal and Illegal Wars in Present-day World. Czech Military Review93(3), 17-29
Download citation

References

  1. ANNAN, Kofi. Two Concepts of Sovereignty. The Economist, September 1999, no.18, p. 49-50.
  2. ANNAN, Kofi. Facing the Humanitarian Challenge: Towards a Culture of Prevention. New York: United Nations, 1999.
  3. BARNETT, Michael - FINNEMORE, Martha. Rules for the World: International Organisations in Global Politics. New York: Cornell University, 2004.
  4. CLARKE, W. When Force is Necessary: NATO's Military Response to the Kosovo Crisis. NATO Review, 1999, no. 12, s. 17.
  5. CONTE, Alex. Security in the 21st Century. London: Ashgate, 2005
  6. COOPER, Ilan - PATTERSON, Eric. UN Authority and the Morality of Force. Survival, December, 2011 - January 2012, vol. 53, no. 6.
  7. DEUDNEY, Daniel - MAULL, Hans. How Britain and France Could Reform the UN Security Council. Survival, October-November 2011, vol. 53, no. 5.
  8. DINI, Lamberto. Taking Responsibility for Balkan security. NATO Review, Autumn, 1999, no. 3, p. 4.
  9. EVANS, Gareth. When is it Right to Fight?, Survival, 2004, vol. 46, no. 3.
  10. FINNEMORE, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University, 1996.
  11. FRANCK, Thomas, M. - Luck, Edward C. at al. Sidelined in Kosovo?: The United Nations' Demise Has Been Exaggerated; Break It, Don't Fake It. Foreign Affais, July-Aug 1999, vol. 78, no. 4.
  12. GLENNON, Michael, J. Why the Security Council Failed. Foreign Affairs, 2003, vol. 82, no. 3, p. 16-35.
  13. HENNING, Dietmar. It Began with a Lie. German TV report refutes government propaganda in Balkan War, March 1, 2001.
  14. Isnard, Jacques. L'Assemblée nationale critique la conduite par l'OTAN des opérations au Kosovo. Le Monde, 16 décembre 1999.
  15. KAMP, Karl-Heint. L'OTAN après le Kosovo: ange de paix ou gendarme du monde? Politique étrangere, 1999, vol. 64, no. 2, p. 255.
  16. MacKENZIE, Lewis. Peacekeeper: The Road to Sarajevo. Harper Collins, 1994.
  17. MacKENZIE, Lewis. We bombed the wrong side? National Post, 6. 4. 2004. Dostupné na http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAC404A.html.
  18. SOLANA, Javier. NATO's success in Kosovo. Foreign Affairs, November-December 1999, vol. 78, no. 6, p. 114-120.
  19. WEISS, Thomas G.- DAWS, Sam (eds). The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  20. SIPRI Yearbook 1999: World Armaments and Disarmament. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1999, s. 50-51.