Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 2/2012: 168-174

Security and Strategic Culture of USA, EU and CRBook review

It is the title of homonymous publication by Jan Eichler from the Institute of Foreign Relations. The author depicts basic characteristics of main features of security and strategic culture of present world. He tries to answer the following three questions: What are historical and political factors of security /strategical culture of respective actors, what are main features of their doctrinal documents, and their impacts on the development of global international relations in the early 21st century? He deduces that the participation of the CR in military interventions in third world countries could generate a risk of terrorist's attacks against not only members of armed forces abroad, but also installations in our state territory.

Published: June 15, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
(2012). Security and Strategic Culture of USA, EU and CR. Czech Military Review93(2), 168-174
Download citation

References

  1. DESCH, C. M. Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies, International Security, 1998, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 142.
  2. GRAY, S. C. Comparative Strategic Culture, Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College, 1984, Vol. 14, No. 4, Winter, pp. 28.
  3. GRAY, S. C. Modern Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  4. GRAY, S. C. National Style in Strategy: The American Example, International Security, 1981, Vol. 6, No. 02, pp. 22.
  5. GRAY, S. C. Out of the Wilderness: Prime Time for Strategic Culture, Comparative Strategy, 2007, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2007 pp. 3.
  6. GRAY, S. C. Strategic culture as context: the first generation of theory strikes back, Review of International Studies, 1999, Vol. 25, No. 01, 1999.
  7. JOHNSTON, I. A. Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
  8. JOHNSTON, I. A. Thinking about Strategic Culture. International Security, 1995, Vol. 19, No. 4.
  9. KLEIN, S. B. Hegemony and Strategic Culture: American Power Projection and Alliance Defence Politics, Review of International Studies, 1988, Vol. 14, No. 2.
  10. KLEIN, S. B. Strategic Studies and World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 3.
  11. LANTIS, S. J. Strategic Culture and National Security Policy. International Studies Review, 2002, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 93.
  12. LOCK, E. Refining Strategic Culture: Return of the Second Generation, Review of International Studies, 2010, Vol. 36, No. 3.
  13. NYE, S. J. Jr. - LYNN-JONES, M. S. International Security Studies: A Report on a Conference on the State of the Field, International Security, 1998, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 14-15.
  14. POORE, S. What is the context? A reply to the Gray-Johnston debate on strategic culture, Review of International Studies, 2003, Vol. 29, No. 02. pp. 282.
  15. Popperův pojem falzifikace. Britský filozof vědy Karl Popper (1902-1994) staví svou základní tezi na argumentu, že hromadění empirických dat, jakkoli exaktních, samo sobě nevede k vytvoření teorie. Žádná teorie nemá charakter absolutní pravdy a její správnost nelze dokázat, ale toliko vyvrátit. Experimentem nebo pozorováním správnost teorie nepotvrzujeme, ale testujeme její odolnost proti vyvrácení. Teorie, pokud má charakter vědeckého zobecnění nějakého jevu, musí být tedy vyvratitelná čili falzifikovatelná. Dostupné mj. na http://www.sisyfos.cz/sisyfos/zpravodaj/sis04_04.htm.
  16. SNYDER, L. J. The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Operations, Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation, 1977, pp. v [vlastní překlad].
  17. SWIDLER, A. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies, American Sociological Review, 1986, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 273-286.