Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 2/2006: 40-51
Wars of the so-called Post-Confrontation Period: Successes, Paradoxes, ChallengesMilitary art
Even after the Cold War, our world is full of local and international conflicts. There were dozens of wars, fringe clashes between local opposing groups in Africa, Asia and so on. Among them there were four wars of lager size, with more than thousands of deaths in each of them that could be characterized as international wars: Desert Storm 1991, Iraqi Freedom 2003, Allied Strength 1999, and Enduring Freedom 2001. Now we can look at them from a distance ...217 Problems tied with those large-scale wars have several levels: supranational (international) level and military level, being accompanied by paradoxes: international and political paradoxes and military ones. This influenced structures and methods of training and preparation of Australian, Britain and US forces. The lessons were embedded into their military concepts, rules and regulations, e.g. Complex Warfighting (Australia), Future Land Operating Concept (UK), Field Manual: Interim Counterinsurgency Operations (US). New roles of military forces, global and local implications, ought to be embedded also into the structures and concepts of the Army of the Czech Republic, concludes the author.
Published: June 15, 2006 Show citation
References
- SMITH, Dan. The Atlas of War and Peace. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2003.
- HUNTINGTON, Samuel. Střet civilizací: Boj kultur a proměna světové řádu. Praha: Rybka, 2001, s. 305.
- HUNTINGTON, Samuel. Střet civilizací: Boj kultur a proměna světového řádu. Praha: Rybka, 2001, s. 379.
- BECK, Ulrich. War Is Peace: On Post-National War. Security Dialog, Vol. 36/1, s. 6.
- CLARK, Wesley. Modern War: Bosnia, Kosovo and the Future. Public Affairs 2001, New York, s. 224.
- MOLLER, Bjorn. The New Revolution in Military Affairs. In: New Roles of Military Forces. Global and Local Implications of the Revolution in Military Affairs. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2003, s. 66.
- LUTTWAK, E. A Post-Heroic Military Policy. Foreign Affairs, 75, 1996, s. 33-44.
- FUKUYAMA, Francis. America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power and the Neoconservative Legacy. 1st edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006. s. 215.
- Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense For Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. Washington, D.C. 20301-3140. September 2004, s. 40.
- Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense For Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. 20301-3140. September 2004, s. 42- 43.
- CLARKE, Richard. Contre tous les ennemis. Au coeur de la guerre américaine contre le terrorisme. Paris: Albin Michel, 2004.
- LUTTWAK Edward N. Give War a Chance. Foreign Affairs. July-August 1999, s. 36-44.
- CONTE, Alex. Security in the 21. Century. The United Nations, Afghanistan and Iraq. Ashgate 2005, s. 51-52.
- SCOWCROFT, Brent and BERGER, Samuel. Getting Serious about Nation-Building. The National Interest, Fall 2005, Issue 81, s. 51.
- Complex Irregular Warfare: The Face of Contemporary Conflict. In: Military Balance 2005/2006, s. 412.
- MARR, Pbebe. Occupational Hazards. Foreign Affairs. July-August 2005, vol. 84, s. 186.
- KREPINEVICH, Andrew. How to Win in Iraq. Foreign Affairs, September-October 2005, Vol. 84, Issue 5, s. 87-104.
- National Strategy for Victory in Iraq. National Security Council. November 20058, s. 20-21.
- EVANS, Gareth, When is it Right to Fight? Survival, Vol. 46, Autumn 2004, No. 3, s. 74.
- Potts, David: Tomorrow's War. In: POTTS, David (ed), The Big Issue: Command and Combat in the Information Age. The Strategic and Combat Studies Institute, The occasional Number 45, 2002, s. 10-14.
- GARDEN, Timothy. Iraq: the military campaign. International Affairs. Vol. 79, July 2003, No. 4, s. 718.
- EVANS, Gareth. When is it Right to Fight? Survival, Vol. 46, Autumn 2004, No. 3, s. 74.


