Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 3/2020: 57-71

Je Turecko připraveno na válku se Sýrií?Recenzované - Přehledový

Vladimír Bízik, Zdeněk Kříž

Tento článek odpovídá na otázku, zda je Turecko připraveno vstoupit do otevřeného vojenského konfliktu se Sýrií Bašára al-Asada. Text vychází z adaptace Clausewitzova předpokladu, že pro vítězné vedení války musí stát disponovat třemi zdroji: vlastními bojovými silami, podporou obyvatelstva a podporou spojenců. Turecko vykazuje slabiny ve vojenské doméně, zejména v oblasti letectva a protivzdušné obrany a není jisté, že by bylo schopné ovládnout vzdušný prostor v konfliktní oblasti. Turecké obyvatelstvo si vleklý zahraniční konflikt dlouhodobě nepřeje. Země je navzdory mnoha neshodám pevně zakotvena v NATO a její strategické zájmy se neliší od zájmů svých strategických spojenců. Turecko si rovněž nemůže dovolit dostat se do přímého konfliktu s Ruskem. Text uzavírá, že Turecko si vstup do otevřeného ozbrojeného konfliktu nemůže dovolit politicky ani vojensky.

Klíčová slova: Sýrie; Rusko; Erdoğan; Putin; Asad; Clausewitz; letectvo; podpora obyvatelstva.

Is Turkey Ready for a War with Syria?

This article examines whether Turkey is ready for a full-scale military conflict with Bashar Al-Assad's Syria. It draws from an adaptation of Clausewitz's concept of three resources that a state must possess to be able to win a war: the fighting forces proper, popular support, and its allies. Turkey is at a significant disadvantage when it comes to its air force and air defense capabilities. Should a major confrontation erupt, Turkey would not be guaranteed to be able to control the relevant air space. Turkish citizens do not favor seeing their country in a foreign quagmire. Despite myriad differences, Turkey it is still deeply embedded within NATO, and its strategic interests do not differ from those of its strategic allies. Turkey also cannot afford to risk an open military conflict with Russia. The article concludes that Turkey is politically and militarily not capable of fighting a full-scale war in Syria.

Keywords: Syria; Russia; Erdoğan; Putin; Assad; Clausewitz; Air Force, Public Support.

Zveřejněno: 15. září 2020  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bízik, V., & Kříž, Z. (2020). Je Turecko připraveno na válku se Sýrií? Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review101(3), 57-71
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. CLAUSEWITZ, Carl von. O válce. Překladatel Zbyněk SEKAL. Praha: Academia, 2008, s. 28.
  2. GRAY, Colin S. Fighting Talk: Forty Maxims on War, Peace, and Strategy Paperback. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2007, s. 24-27.
  3. GRAY, Colin S. War, Peace, and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History. London: Routledge, 2008, s. 8.
  4. HANDEL, Michael I. Masters of War: Classical Strategic Thought [online]. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2012, s. 90 [cit. 09.07.2020]. Dostupné z: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=254399
  5. SÖNMEZ, Mustafa. Mystery surrounds Turkey's $40 billion refugee bill. In: Al-Monitor [online]. 2. 11. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2019/10/turkey-syria-40-billion-refugee-bill-calls-for-explanation.html
  6. GALL, Carlotta. Turkey Launches Deadly Airstrikes Against Syrian Forces. In: The New York Times [online]. 3. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/03/world/middleeast/turkey-syria-idlib.html
  7. DANFORTH, Nick. Turkey's New Maps Are Reclaiming the Ottoman Empire. In: Foreign Policy [online]. 23. 10. 2016 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/23/turkeys-religious-nationalists-want-ottoman-borders-iraq-erdogan/
  8. HUGHES, Lindsay. Russia and Turkey in Syria: The Erosion of the Friendship? (Strategic Analysis Paper). Future Directions International, 2020.
  9. TISDALL, Simon. Erdoğan is reaping what he sowed: Turkey is on the brink of disaster in Syria. In: The Guardian [online]. 2. 3. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/02/erdogan-turkey-syria-assad
  10. PITEL, Laura, Henry FOY a Chloe CORNISH. Idlib residents put little faith in Russian-Turkish peace deal. In: Financial Times [online]. 8. 3. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.ft.com/content/83ed1fd2-6131-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5
  11. EDROOS, Faisal a Ahmad EL AMRAOUI. Why Turkey's military is not what it used to be. In: Al Jazeera [online]. 5. 6. 2018 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/turkey-military-180527105359421.html
  12. ŞAHIN, Hakan. Turkey's Play with Its Military. Mediterranean Quarterly. 2018, roč. 29, č. 4, s. 33-37.
  13. DANĚK, Pavel a Zdeněk KŘÍŽ. Politický vliv turecké armády. Politologická revue [edo]. 2011, roč. 17, č. 2, s. 48.
  14. SINGH, Chaitram a John HICKMAN. Soldiers as Saviors of the State: The Cases of Turkey and Pakistan Contrasted. Journal of Third World Studies. 2013, roč. 30, č. 1.
  15. ŞAHIN, Hakan. Turkey's Play with Its Military, s. 36.
  16. KIRBY, Paul. Who's the target of Turkey's purge? In: BBC News [online]. 20. 7. 2016 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36835340
  17. EDROOS, Faisal a Ahmad EL AMRAOUI. Why Turkey's military is not what it used to be.
  18. Thematic Country of Origin Information Report Turkey: Military service [online]. The Hague: Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, 2019, s. 5. Dostupné z: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/ambtsberichten/2019/07/11/thematisch-ambtsbericht-dienstplicht-turkije-juli-2019/EN+Tab+Turkije+dienstplicht+4+juli+2019+zonder+vertrouwelijke+bronnen.pdf
  19. HAUGOM, Lars. An Uncertain Future for the Turkish Armed Forces. In: The Turkey Analyst [online]. 26. 9. 2017 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/588-an-uncertain-future-for-the-turkish-armed-forces.html
  20. ŞAHIN, Hakan. Turkey's Play with Its Military, s. 46.
  21. HAUGOM, Lars. An Uncertain Future for the Turkish Armed Forces.
  22. Turkey. In: CIA World Factbook [online] [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tu.html
  23. Thematic Country of Origin Information Report Turkey: Military service, s. 13.
  24. HAUGOM, Lars. An Uncertain Future for the Turkish Armed Forces.
  25. AKAR, Hulusi. Bakan Akar: Bahar Kalkani Harekâti Planlandiği Şekilde Başariyla Devam Ediyor. In: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Millî Savunma Bakanliği [online]. 2. 3. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.msb.gov.tr/SlaytHaber/232020-33761
  26. SPICER, Jonathan a Khalil ASHAWI. President Erdogan's options narrow as Russia presses Syrian crisis to Turkey's doorstep. In: Reuters [online]. 27. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-security-crisis-erdogan-analysi-idUSKCN20L2I0
  27. KARADENIZ, Tulay a Michael MARTINA. Turkey confirms cancellation of $3.4 billion missile defence project awarded to China. In: Reuters [online]. 18. 11. 2015 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-china-missile-idUSKCN0T61OV20151118
  28. HAUGOM, Lars. An Uncertain Future for the Turkish Armed Forces.
  29. THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES (IISS). The Military Balance 2020. London: Routledge, 2020, s. 153.
  30. KASAPOĞLU, Can. Turkey's S-400 Dilemma. Istanbul: The Centre for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies (EDAM), 2017, s. 1-3.
  31. GÜMRÜKÇÜ, Tuvan a Can SEZER. Turkey says delivery of second Russian S-400 batch may be delayed - Reuters. In: Reuters [online]. 4. 11. 2019 [cit. 17.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-turkey-defense/turkey-says-delivery-of-second-russian-s-400-batch-may-be-delayed-idUSKBN1XE0U1
  32. YINANÇ, Barçin. The outcome of local elections might unleash anti-Syrian rhetoric. In: Hürriyet Daily News [online]. 2. 7. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/opinion/barcin-yinanc/the-outcome-of-local-elections-might-unleash-anti-syrian-rhetoric-144610;KINIKLIOĞLU, Suat. Syrian refugees in Turkey: changing attitudes and fortunes. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik [online]. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 2020, č. SWP Comment 2020/C 05 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2020C05/
  33. Türkiye'nin Nabzi - Ayin 5 Rakami / Şubat 2020. In: MetroPoll Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştirmalar [online]. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.metropoll.com.tr/arastirmalar/sosyal-arastirma-12/1839
  34. A&G ARAŞTIRMA. Adil Gür İdlib anketiyle bomba gibi düştü! Şehit verilmesinden kim sorumlu. In: İnternet Haber [online]. 2. 3. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.internethaber.com/adil-gur-idlib-anketiyle-bomba-gibi-dustu-sehit-verilmesinden-kim-sorumlu-foto-galerisi-2085738.htm
  35. POULTON, Hugh. Top Hat, Grey Wolf, and Crescent: Turkish Nationalism and the Turkish Republic. Washington Square, N.Y.: New York University Press, 1997, s. 246-251.
  36. AYDIN, Mustafa. Türk Diş Politikasi Kamuoyu Algilari Araştirmasi, 17 Haziran 2020. In: Kadir Has Üniversitesi [online]. 17. 6. 2020 [cit. 30.06.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.khas.edu.tr/sites/khas.edu.tr/files/inline-files/DPA2020_BASIN%5B1%5D.pdf
  37. DALAY, Galip a E. Fuat KEYMAN. Turkish-U.S. Strategic Decoupling Through the Prism of Syria [online]. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/turkish-u-s-strategic-decoupling-through-the-prism-of-syria/
  38. SLOAT, Amanda. The West's Turkey Conundrum [online]. Washington, D.C: Brookings - Robert Bosch Foundation, 2018. Dostupné z: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/fp_20180212_west_turkey_conundrum.pdf
  39. DANFORTH, Nick. The Outlook for Turkish Democracy: 2023 and Beyond [online]. Washington, D.C: THe Washington Institute of Near East Policy, 2020. Dostupné z: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/uploads/Documents/pubs/PolicyNote77-Danforth.pdf
  40. Turkey 2018 Human Rights Report. In: United States Department of State [online]. 2018. Dostupné z: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/TURKEY-2018-HUMAN-RIGHTS-REPORT.pdf
  41. WADHAMS, Nick. NATO Chief Says Turkey Remains Important Ally Despite S-400 Deal. In: Bloomberg [online]. 18. 7. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-07-18/nato-chief-says-turkey-remains-important-ally-despite-s-400-deal
  42. North East Syria: Council adopts conclusions. In: European Council / Council of the European Union [online]. 14. 10. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/10/14/council-conclusions-on-north-east-syria/
  43. Foreign Affairs Council, 14 October 2019. In: European Council / Council of the European Union [online]. 14. 10. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2019/10/14/ "; EMMOTT, Robin. EU Governments Limit Arms Sales to Turkey but Avoid Embargo. Reuters [online]. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-syria-security-eu-france-idUSKBN1WT0M4
  44. BELKIN, Paul. NATO: Key Issues Following the 2019 Leaders' Meeting. In: Congressional Research Service [online]. 2019. Dostupné z: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R46066.pdf; Patriots at Incirlik Base can remain for 6 months more in 2020, Spanish defense minister says. In: Daily Sabah [online]. 25. 10. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.dailysabah.com/defense/2019/10/25/patriots-at-incirlik-base-can-remain-for-6-months-more-in-2020-spanish-defense-minister-says
  45. EU-Turkey statement, 18 March 2016. In: European Council / Council of the European Union [online]. 18. 3. 2016 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkey-statement/; The EU Facility for Refugees in Turkey. In: European Comission [online]. 6. 12. 2016 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/news_corner/migration_en
  46. Idlib: Greece veto of NATO statement [online]. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://europediplomatic.com/2020/02/29/idlib-greece-veto-of-nato-statement/
  47. THEUSSEN, Amelie a Dominika KUNERTOVA. Why Turkey can't expect military support from NATO over attacks in Syria. In: The Conversation [online]. 6. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://theconversation.com/why-turkey-cant-expect-military-support-from-nato-over-attacks-in-syria-132838
  48. Press point by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg following the North Atlantic Council meeting at Turkey's request for Article 4 consultations on the situation in Syria. In: NATO [online]. 28. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_173931.htm; Statement by the Secretary General after Article 4 consultations. In: NATO [online]. 28. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_173939.htm
  49. BALCI, Ali. A Three-level Analysis of Turkey's Crisis with the U.S.-led Order. Insight Turkey [online]. 2019, roč. 21, č. 4, s. 21-22 [cit. 09.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/a-three-level-analysis-of-turkeys-crisis-with-the-us-led-order
  50. CUPOLO, Diego. Delayed S-400 Activation could offer chance for Turkey-US ties to warm. In: Al-Monitor [online]. 21. 4. 2020 [cit. 21.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/04/s-400-delay-us-turkey-window-opportunity.html
  51. ERDEM, Bora. US-Turkey Relations in the Light of Turkey's Freedom of Press. Global Media Journal. 2018, roč. 16, č. 30.
  52. OĞUZLU, H. Tarik. Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace [online]. 2018, s. 135 [cit. 13.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/920715
  53. AYDIN, Mustafa. Türk Diş Politikasi Kamuoyu Algilari Araştirmasi, 17 Haziran 2020.
  54. LUBOLD, Gordon, Felicia SCHWARTZ a Nancy A. YOUSSEF. U.S. Pares Back Use of Turkish Base Amid Strains With Ankara. In: Wall Street Journal [online]. 11. 3. 2018 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-pares-back-use-of-turkish-base-amid-strains-with-ankara-1520766121
  55. TRUMP, Donald J. Executive Order on Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Syria. In: The White House [online]. 14. 10. 2019 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-suspending-entry-certain-persons-contributing-situation-syria/
  56. Multilateral (06-1231) - Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Production, Sustainment, and Follow-On Development of the Joint Strike Fighter. In: United States Department of State [online]. 31. 12. 2006 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.state.gov/06-1231
  57. COOK, Steven A. The War in Syria Is Turkey's Problem, Not America's. In: Foreign Policy [online]. 3. 6. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/06/syria-turkey-us-problem-idlib-crisis/
  58. ÇAǦAPTAY, Soner. Erdogan's Empire: Turkey and the politics of the Middle East. London: I.B. Tauris, 2019, s. 131.
  59. ARAL, Berdal. "The World is Bigger than Five": A Salutary Manifesto of Turkey's New International Outlook. Insight Turkey [online]. 2019, roč. 21, č. 4 [cit. 09.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.insightturkey.com/article/the-world-is-bigger-than-five-a-salutary-manifesto-of-turkeys-new-international-outlook
  60. Turkey thanks Putin for unconditional support over coup attempt - Turkey News. In: Hürriyet Daily News [online]. 25. 7. 2016 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-thanks-putin-for-unconditional-support-over-coup-attempt - 102062
  61. AKTÜRK, Şener. Relations between Russia and Turkey Before, During, and After the Failed Coup of 2016. Insight Turkey [online]. 2019, roč. 21, č. 4, s. 105 [cit. 09.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.insightturkey.com/article/relations-between-russia-and-turkey-before-during-and-after-the-failed-coup-of-2016
  62. MEYER, Henry a Firat KOZOK. Putin Swallows Irritation at Erdogan as Syria Strains Ties - Bloomberg. In: Bloomberg [online]. 6. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-06/putin-swallows-irritation-at-erdogan-as-syria-clash-strains-ties
  63. TOL, Gönül a Ömer TAŞPINAR. Turkey's Russian Roulette. In: MEZRAN, Karim a Arturo VARVELLI, eds. The MENA Region: A Great Power Competition [online]. Milano: ISPI and Atlantic Council, 2019, s. 121-123 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.ledizioni.it/download/25762/
  64. ILYAS, Ahmet a Murat SILINIR. Strategic Role of Nationalism in Nation-State Building Process: Comparative Historical and Instrumental Analysis of Italy, Germany and Turkey in the Context of Nationalism. European Journal of Social Sciences. 2016, roč. 51, č. 4, s. 262.
  65. WORKMAN, Daniel. Turkey's Top Trading Partners. In: World's Top Exports [online]. 1. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.worldstopexports.com/turkeys-top-import-partners/
  66. HALE, William. Turkey, America, Russia and the Syrian Civil War. Insight Turkey [online]. 2019, roč. 21, č. 4, s. 38 [cit. 09.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.insightturkey.com/commentary/turkey-the-us-russia-and-the-syrian-civil-war
  67. ÇAǦAPTAY, Soner. Turkey's Options for Pressuring Russia in Idlib Are Limited. In: The Washington Institute [online]. 11. 2. 2020 [cit. 16.04.2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/turkeys-options-for-pressuring-russia-in-idlib-are-limited