Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. MC/2016: 49-60

Free-Riding Problem in AllianceReviewed - Review

Jakub Odehnal

Long-term cuts in military expenditures of European allied countries caused growing differences within the Alliance which can be seen in uneven sharing of military burden and in behaviour called free-riding. The aim of this contribution is to define possible approaches to the freeriding identification and to analyse military expenditure development in relation to conclusions and recommendations declared at the NATO Summit in 2014. The results of military expenditure analysis identify only a small group of countries which, from a long-term point of view, follow the recommendations of the Alliance in the form of allocating a corresponding amount as percentage of GDP and in the form of a recommended structure of military expenditures.

Keywords: Military Expenditures; Defence Budget; Free Rider

Published: October 15, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Odehnal, J. (2016). Free-Riding Problem in Alliance. Czech Military Review97(MC), 49-60
Download citation

References

  1. NIKOLAIDOU, Eftychia. "The demand for military expenditure: evidence from the EU15 (1961-2005)." Defence and Peace Economics Vol. 21, No. 3, 2008, 273-292.
  2. DUNNE, J. Paul, Eftychia NIKOLAIDOU, and Nikolaos MYLONIDIS. The demand for military spending in the peripheral economies of Europe. Defence and Peace Economics Vol. 14, No. 6, 2003, 447-460.
  3. SIPRI Military Expenditure Database 2015, http://milexdata.sipri.org
  4. SANDLER, Todd and MURDOCH, James. C. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies, 21, 2000, 297-327.
  5. The SIPRI definition of military expenditure includes all current and capital expenditure on the following activities: the armed forces (including peace-keeping forces), the civil administrations of the military sector (defence ministries and other government agencies engaged in defence activities), paramilitary forces (non-regular armed forces which are judged to be trained, equipped and available for military operations) and military space activities. Such expenditure should include the following components: personnel, operations and maintenance, arms procurement, military research and development (R&D), military construction and military aid.
  6. SAMUELSON, Paul. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVI, 1954, 387-389.
  7. HAMPL, Mojmír. Trojí přístup k veřejným statkům. Finance a úvěr. 51(2), 2001, 111-125.
  8. SAMUELSON, Paul. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXVI, 1954, 387-389.
  9. SANDLER, Todd and MURDOCH, James. C. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies, 21, 2000, 297-327.
  10. SAMUELSON, Paul. Pure Theory of Public Expenditure and Taxation. In: Margolis, J. D. Guitton, H. (eds.): Public Economics: An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and their Relations to the Private Sector. London, Macmillan, 1969.
  11. SANDLER, Todd and MURDOCH, James. C. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies, 21, 2000, 297-327.
  12. OLSON, Mancur, and Richard ZECKHAUSER. An economic theory of alliances. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1966, 266-279.
  13. SANDLER, Todd and MURDOCH, James. C. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies, 21, 2000, 297-327.
  14. SANDLER, Todd, and MURDOCH, James. C. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies, 21, 2000, 297-327.
  15. JANELIŪNAS Tomas and Martynas ZAPOLSKIS. Lithuania as a Rational Free Rider in NATO. In Robert Czulda, Marek Madej. NEWCOMERS NO MORE? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspective of "Post-Cold War" Members. 1. vyd. Warsaw - Prague - Brussels: International Relations Research Institute in Warsaw, 2015. ISBN 978-83-62784-04-2.
  16. SANDLER, Todd and Keith HARTLEY. Economics of Alliances: The Lessons for Collective Action. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2001,869-896.
  17. JANELIŪNAS Tomas and Martynas ZAPOLSKIS. Lithuania as a Rational Free Rider in NATO. In Robert Czulda, Marek Madej. NEWCOMERS NO MORE? Contemporary NATO and the Future of the Enlargement from the Perspective of "Post-Cold War" Members. 1. vyd. Warsaw - Prague - Brussels: International Relations Research Institute in Warsaw, 2015. ISBN 978-83-62784-04-2.
  18. SANDLER, Todd and MURDOCH, James. C. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies, 21, 2000, 297-327.
  19. SANDLER, Todd and Keith HARTLEY. Economics of Alliances: The Lessons for Collective Action. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2001,869-896.
  20. SANDLER, Todd, and MURDOCH, James. C. On Sharing NATO Defence Burdens in the 1990s and Beyond. Fiscal Studies, 21, 2000, 297-327.
  21. ODEHNAL, Jakub. Military Expenditures and Free-Riding in NATO. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy Vol. 21, No. 4, 2015, 479-487.
  22. DE LA FE, Pedro GONZALEZ, and Daniel MONTOLIO. Has Spain been free-riding in nato? An econometric approach. Defence and Peace Economics Vol. 12. no.5, 2001, 465-485.
  23. PLÜMPER, Thomas, and Eric NEUMAYER. Free-riding in alliances testing: An old theory with a new method. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 2014.
  24. MIČÁNEK, František, HOLCNER, Vladan, ODEHNAL, Jakub, OLEJNÍČEK, Aleš, ŠULC, František, Zdrojové zajištění obrany České republiky: Perspektivy a možnosti, Vojenské rozhledy, 2014, roč. 23 (55), č. 3, s. 9-21, ISSN 1210-3292 (tištěná verze), ISSN 2336-2995.; BRIZGALOVÁ Lenka, Vojenské výdaje a jejich vyhodnocení ve vybraných zemích Evropské unie, Vojenské rozhledy, 2012, roč. 21 (53), č. 4, s. 111-121, ISSN 1210-3292.; MIČÁNEK, František, a kol., Zpráva o stavu zabezpečení obrany ČR v roce 2014 - mýty a realita, Vojenské rozhledy, 2014, roč. 23 (55), č. 2, ISSN 2336-2995 (on line), dostupné z http://www.vojenskerozhledy.cz/aktuality/2-uncategorised/66-zprava-o-stavu-zabezpeceni-obrany-cr-v-roce-2014-myty-a-realita; PROCHÁZKA, Josef. Adaptation of the Czech Republic Defence Policy - Lessons Learned. Security and Defence, 2015, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 15-28. ISSN 2300-8741.