Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 1/2014: 178-187

Military Review: How to Continue (The Case of Decision-Making Analysis)Nonreviewed - Other

Prof. PhDr. František Ochrana, DrSc.

This polemics is written by Prof. Fr. Ochrana, both reader and author of the Military Review quarterly. It is a response to the article in No 4, 2013, by Vl. Karaffa, editorial board chairman. Prof. Ochrana generally supports his conclusions concerning the further survival of this Czech Military Review. According to him, the review has indispensable role in the spectrum of both civilian and military professional journals. He recommends to evaluate the problem of its existence upon the principles of cost/benefit analysis, with regard to the so-called socials costs, the key steps of which he enumerates.

Keywords: Target group, authors' community, readers' public, setting change goals, fixing variants, evaluation criteria, military science, professional peer-reviewed journal, peer-review process, foreign journals with a non-zero impact factor, SCOPUS journals.

Published: March 15, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ochrana, F. (2014). Military Review: How to Continue (The Case of Decision-Making Analysis). Czech Military Review95(1), 178-187
Download citation

References

  1. OCHRANA, F. Veřejné výdajové programy, veřejné projekty a zakázky (jejich tvorba, hodnocení a kontrola. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2011, 219 s. ISBN 978-80-7357-644-8.
  2. MUSGRAVE, R. A. - MUSGRAVEOVÁ, P. B. Veřejné finance v teorii a praxi. Praha: Management Press, 1994, 581 s. ISBN 80-85603-76-4.
  3. HAŠEK, J. Čím trpí aparát expedice. In HAŠEK, J. Velitelem města Bugulmy. Praha: Československý spisovatel, 1966. 220 s. D -02-50308.